Tuesday, January 15, 2019
Public Space Planning
universe space provides the grounds for cities to be seen and experienced. Whether it is a squ be, a market, or a park, world space in cities has been noted as the place where ideas ar exchanged, city identity is built and citizenship is learned (Carr et al. , 1992 Low, 2000 Goodsell, 2003). Such places are all important(p) and even necessary for citizens to enjoy a good quality of purport and well-being (Relph, 1993). Historically, public places have played an important role in cities in many cultures.Public spaces such as the Greek agora, Spanish plaza, and compound town square provided a place for markets, celebrations and civic life to dilate (Carr et al. , 1992). In modern cities public spaces play many diverse roles they are sites of recreation, economic development, consumption and community they take shape as plazas, put and urban entertainment areas they mean many things to many people and merchantman establish an identity for a neighborhood or a city at large. Pu blic spaces, in any incarnation, are important to civic life (Goodsell, 2003).While we may have a good grounds of wherefore public spaces are important in cities, what is still largely unbeknown(predicate) is how the supply process itself contributes to the development of these important places. In addition to understanding the role of public spaces in cities today, the means of public space creation, the key interests, processes, and motivations involved with their construction, must also be scrutinized and better understood in order to come to a full understanding of how public spaces reach out their desired goals.Two case studies were chosen to illustrate approaches to public space proviso Torontos Yonge Dundas even up and the metropolis of Mississaugas City Centre Parks. These sites were chosen because of their similarities and also because of their differences. Both sites were intended to achieve similar goals of creating a good sense of place and creating new opportu nities for economic development in their cities. Their efforts, though, are winning place in very different contexts and employ different planning approaches.In Mississauga, a rapidly growing city with a developing business district core, a placemaking process featuring public workshops and staff training was used. In the Yonge Dundas Square example, located at one of Torontos historic commercial nodes, a public-private partnership was used to achieve the goals of the project. In addition, the cases are also at different stages in their development. The Mississauga project has only completed its initial visioning and explorative design stages while the Yonge Dundas Square project is nearing completion.In choosing these disparate cases, I was qualified to explore the strengths and weaknesses of different styles of public space planning. Specifically, these cases allowed me to investigate differences between what seemed to be a tightly controlled planning process in Yonge Dundas S quare and a seemly very public planning process in Mississauga. Ultimately, the the standardiseds ofness of these cases helped me to elicit relevant criticisms and policy recommendations for planners of public space, regardless of the process they are working within.Through research about these case studies, key informant interviews and in-depth abridgment of planning documents and relevant literature this report presents a critique of public space planning processes practiced in the context of Yonge Dundas Square and the City Centre Parks. While having goals that use the language of sense of place, the planning processes active are more effective in serving the economic goals of the projects. Because socio-cultural goals like sense of place are defined broadly and grow everyplace time, the planning process does little to directly address them.Ultimately this report suggests that socio-cultural goals like sense of place should not be removed as a goal of public space planning, but rather, the planning process should undertake to reconcile economic and socio-cultural goals. By increasing awareness of the importance of the socio-cultural mapping of public space through educational outreach to developers and the public at large, as well as by incorporating socio-cultural goals into long-term strategic plans and mission statements, municipalities squeeze out more effectively create public spaces that are not only economically strong, but also socially important to their citizens.