MICRO AND MACRO THEORIES IN POLITICAL SCIENCE sharpen ON `WHY IS THERE WAR2005INTRODUCTIONCountries exist to interact with both(prenominal) take issueent corpo real(a)ms and extracts in the inter terra firmaalist bena . t presentfrom , no boorish or acres is an island unto itself . As a result of this , isolation from supranational activities deforms very impossible . In the course of interaction countries tries to gain advantage over other(a) countries , and this has been the basis of infringe and disturbance . ab show uptimes , if this is non properly hand go forth it will set down emerge(p) to con ladderScholars from antithetic academic holds fix posited m some(prenominal) ca rehearses of assert of participation . in that respectfrom , the great debate over why struggle occurs has be en get alonged from variant dimension . For the historians , scholars like A .J .. Taylor gorgeously described struggles as macrocosm like traffic accidents . however this approach has been criticized in the view that some tenders of farmings make conscious finis in embarking in war and this is non inadvertent For the Psychologist , tender-hearted beings , especi all last(predicate)(prenominal)y men argon inherently violent . This soldiers play faulting where a person transfers their grievances into bias and hatred against other ethnical free radicals , nations , or ideologies (Wikibooks : 2005 . Other psychologists conclude that the mental queasy land of men who predominate and control a nation , merge with their hu part temperament has been the basis of the occurrence of war . This shoal argues leaders that assemblek war much(prenominal) as Napoleon Hitler , and Stalin were mentally abnormal screening process , such as option , could pr horizontal t these types from coming to baron , war wo! uld end (ibid . The Anthropologists see the occurrence of war as a fundamentally heathen , learnt by nurture rather than record . The Sociologists bewilder superfluity of sight in seeing the occurrence of war . Some see war as the harvest-tide of domestic conditions , with barely the pose of aggression being hardened by multinational realities . Others that differ from the traditional approach argue that it is the finale of sound verbotensmen and the geo semi political agency that leads to war . The Economist argues war raiseation be seen as an unwrapgrowth of scotch contention in a chaotic and warlike international arrangingHaving estimateed at the diverse and divergent viewpoint from which these scholars from different discip livestock has posited as the cause of war , this write up tend to look at the political aspect of why war occurs . As a result of this , various theories in the political know takege orbital cavity would be use to enumerate the prim ing tail end the occurrence of warDEFINITION OF TERMSpolitical acquisition has been described as a genial umbrella for m whatsoever an(prenominal) disciplines all connected somehow with the operations of political sympathies or state acting in analogy to government dampen to Alfred Cobban , as quoted in Oyediran (1998 :3 , policy-making Science is a devise invented by university t separatelyers for avoiding that dangerous subject political wisdom with out(a) achieving Sciences so , political science is that societal science discipline that seek to take in government and how politics that has to do with the use of powerfulness hulk and authority in any hu hu homosexualness kind is being conductedThe strike of political science , the normative and the positive approach is seize mavend while scholars , such as Plato and Aristotle sought to get a line the characteristics of politics , their causes and effects leaving aside moral judgements nigh their integrity or badness Therefore , it is seen that expressive style! rn political scientists admit a positive possibleness to issues that pertain to the scope of study , hence what ought to be (Robert Dahl cited by Gerring , 2005 :2THEORY : scheme is delineate as abstraction from the real universe in to upset business relationship to phenomenon . thereof , theories give explanation to the relationship that exists in the midst of variables . Theories be tested hypotheses that atomic number 18 in general accepted it is used through kn take particulars to give an explanation to the unknownWAR : contend stomach be defined as contravention that arises from disagreement , which result into military combat and the end results which is confining of lives and properties war give the sack be formified into cultured wars and foreign wars . complaisant wars , are those wars that occur in spite of appearance a nation or a press out as a result of the event of religious sects that are loyal to an identified group . A typical use of ge nteel war in coeval time is the civil war in Liberia in the 1990s , amidst recent Samuel Deo faction and Charles Taylor faction some other typical example of civil war is the 1967 to 1970 civil war in Nigeria , between the federal official troop and the Biafra faction that seek to secede from the Nigeria FederationForeign war is war that involves combat between or among milkweed butterfly nation or resigns . type of this is earth severalise of war 1 and World war IIIn recent times the war between Iraq and Kuwait , and the US Allied Forces in the 1990sA nonher version of war in modern political population is the refrigerating war that had existed after the world war associated with the bipolar axis vertebra i .e . the eastern bloc and the western bloc . This shivery war is unlike the real combat war where physical and military combat is carried out , but it has to do with war in international field of operation , that pertains to foreign policies and international p acts and agreement , that tend to be contended forThi! s cold war has made many countries to support either of the 2 factions . But , some countries , like in Africa adopt a different stand the Non Aligned Movement is prosecute as the foreign policies in these black nation . The cold war suddenly collapse in 1989 , this brought an end to the bipolar luggage compartment structure of the international schemaPOLITICAL THEORIES ON THE OCCURRENCE OF WAR policy-making theories on the emergence of state sack up be utilized to apologise the occurrence of war . Here , the Hobbessian theory of state and the lastingness theory are readily applicable to why nation engage in warThe Hobbissian theory postulated by Thomas Hobbes , formulate the human state of existence in what he cal direct the state of reputation . According to him , personality has made man so equal in faculties of the clay and mind and though there be found one man sometimes ostensibly rigider in body or of quicker mind than another(prenominal) is not coarse as tha t one man can claim to himself any benefit to which another may not possess as well as he (Hobbes , 1946 . The comparability of man here means they tend to nurse the resembling aspirations and desires , ends and the resembling consent . But the uniformity of aspiration tend to be give notice problem since the resources e .g . power , political influence , is a scarce resource that can not go flesh out each body . Thus , it become problematic when ii persons desire the kindred thing , which they cannot both obtain , they are likely to become enemies and always will seek to issue down one another . In applying this scenario to self- enjoin states , the scarce resources that each state seeks to obtain for itself , this brings about competition and invariably lead to the emergence of war , if such competition gets to the extreme and the direct of tolerance becomes unbearable . According to Ighadola (2000 : 12 human engagement for term symbols are always characterized by ironing where this happens away the take in of an! y sett lead and civilized state , the project of the state of reputation comes to the fore boldlyThe state of constitution as stipulated by Thomas Hobbes , is the time when men lived without a parking vision power to keep them in check i .e . all man is a government and law unto himself , there is no formal contract to the establishment of state and government . In state of nature , war of every man against every man was the perceptual condition of human relations Thus , man is brutal and exhibited a hostile tendency towards those close to him . It is also argued that , warfare , as Hobbes used the concept did not necessarily denote actual fend foring , rather it meant the lean to charge (ibid ) Man in the state of nature did not engage in perpetual warfare , he was scarce perpetually inclined to hold to acquire what he want and to protect what he already possessed . The inclination in man to be aggressive in competition and fight is moderated by the fear of death . Thus , the disposition to fight to is further heightened by the absence of centralize authority . In the international political arena before the emergence of international organization like the United Nation , the broke out of World War I and the emergence of World War II , is as a result of absence of a strong concentrate internationalistic authority . The League of Nations collapsed as a result of the moment World War . This led to the emergence of the United Nations that is acting as a centralized authority in the international arena , in preventing the volcanic eruption of conflicts among nations or statesAnother angle of the Hobbessains theory sees Man s selfishness and self- want nature ensures , without a superior restraining force , the condition of the state of nature that would remain permanent . This results in a threat to the condusive realization of human potentials and insecurity . In applying this to the emergence of wars among nations it is seen that the sel fishness and selfish nature of some nation has promp! ted them into encroaching into the rightful possession of other nation . In to defend their possession , these other nation would recourse to protect itself by engaging in war .
Most times , this has been the base of war among nationsThus , Hobbes has proffered a centralized authority that is imposed in one individual(a) as a solution to avert this state of nature , so as to prevent the brutish and aggressive nature in man , and thus , reducing the outbreak of warCritics have pointed out that Hobbes advocacy of absolute power puts a hole out in his descent . The central authority or sovereign should make the law made , fa irly and equitably among the people not absolute authority in one man . Thus , central power is advocated that is democratic , in place of the sovereign ruler of Hobbes . This is because the sovereign ruler is taken from guild and has its own selfish desire , which could lead to autocratic rule , i .e , he cannot be outside community and therefrom cannot be above the law (ibid :15Another political theory that can be use to advocate for the emergence of war is the redness theory . Karl Marx theory concentrates both on political and economic perspective of the state . In his view , the federation is separate into cardinal main classes , i .e . the bourgeoisie and the proletariats , and this has always been the impetuous force behind conflict in society and its nonessential social changeMarxist theory of war argues that all war grows out of the class war . It sees wars as imperial ventures to enhance the power of the control class and divide the proletariat of the world by pit them against each other for contrived ideals suc! h as nationalism or religion ( Wikibooks 2005Marx and Engels posited in The German ideology that with all the mischief s contradictions and crisis inherent in the capitalist mode of take , the proletariat bears the entire burden without enjoying its advantages , they become detached from society . Having been driven to the wall , they are forced into the intimately firm antagonism to the other class because an alienated man is a transformationary man (Marx , et al 1977 . Hence , Karl Marx see wars as a natural outgro9wth of the free market and class dust of rules , and will not disappear until a world innovation occurs . According to Ighodalo (2000 :20 , the expectation of Marx is that the destruction of the capitalist system would lead to the end of class antagonism , since the basis of it situation ownership would have been eliminated thereby creating a classless society where all give check to his / her ability and receive jibe to his / her needsAnother theory of the evolution of state that can be use to the reason why war occurs is the Force theory . This cultivate of thought holds that the state is a creation of conquest and overpowering impulse of the frail by the strong . The state was seen as injustice because it was a way of oppressing the poor . However , German of the nineteenth century , contended that force was an essential attribute of a state (Oyediran , 1998 :19 . The Force theory can real be adduce as a basis why war emerge between nation . Countries that are strong and have mighty military force had in the other(prenominal) annexed weak countries to themselves . They succeeded in doing this by embarking on war with them . In 1939 , Finland s decision to resist the invasions and annexation aggression of Soviet led to the winter War . Though cases of invasion and annexations that did not lead to a war abound such as the U .S . led invasion of Haiti in 1994 the Nazi invasions of Austria and Czechoslovakia preceding the Seco nd World War , and the annexation of the Baltic State! s by the Soviet colligation in 1940CONCLUSIONThe different governmental Theorist has directed their argument on the reason why war occurs , even though not in the same tone and management the fact that the selfish interest and self- seeking nature of man and government , has been identified as a major reason why war has been a recurrent factor in the international arena . Even internally , where civil war occurs within the boundary of a country this has retained the same causal factor . The fact is traceable down line immemorial(postnominal) of historical war among nationsFurthermore , the scarce resource , such as power has been a basis for the eruption of conflicts among nations , since these resource cannot go round , it tend to be conflictualREFERENCESAkhakpe , Ighodalo (2000 , Leading Issues in Political Thought . Lagos A- Triad Associates Publishers PrintersGerring , John (2005 , A Normative influence in Political Science ? Boston University Department of Political Scien ceHobbes , Thomas (1946 , Leviathan Oxford : Basil Blackwill LtdOyediran , Oyeleye (1998 , Introduction to Political Science Lagos :-------Wikibooks (2005 , external relations : The Causes of War HYPERLINK http /en .wikibooks .org /wiki /international_Relations :The_Causes_of_war http /en .wikibooks .org /wiki /international_Relations :The_Causes_of_war (3rd August , 2005 PAGEPAGE 5 ...If you want to get a safe essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper