Tuesday, May 28, 2019
Japan and Korea Essay -- History Historical Korea Japan Essays
lacquer and KoreaDid Japan modernize or exploit Korea? Scholars consume debated this question with vigor throughout this century. I do not moot the answer is so black and white. While looking at the history of the colonization, evidence of both should appear. The word colonization alone generally means to touch on into other peoples land and exploit resources. However, positive results can appear during a negative situation.Regardless of what point of view an individual takes, in that location is no doubt that Japan has dramatically influenced Korea. This is common with most nations in the industrialization flow or the modernization period. Think about it, every agreement endorsed between nations leads to policy change. The lessons learned from previous agreements, aid in creating new policies.Korea, suggested by Cummings, was a buffer zone between chinaware and Japan. China acted as the big brother or role model for Korea. Culture, language values and society itself develop ed by free choices made by the Korean government. However, China was always ready to step in if Korea seemed to get to fountainful or weak. Cummings makes this relationship sound as if everything was all right as yen as Korea depended on the aid of China and respected Chinas dominance of the region. Japan although at times respected Chinas power believed that if Korea would consider themselves equal to China Japan could take the role of the regional superpower. Japan also, at times thought they were superior to both China and Japan and should incorporate them both into the Japanese empire and at times had been fairly successful in dong so.Many factors allowed the Japanese colonization of Korea. For one, Korea had adopted an isolationist philosophy early in its history. Cummings has said many times that when you landed in Korea the first question asked was when are you leaving? In addition, Korean tradition did not place a high value on trade. Cummings went on to say that Korea was the only place that when a profit was made, it was not a joyous occasion. Do not be misled by that statement that would leave one to think that Korean people were inferior and should be exploited, for I do not believe that at all. The Confucianism heritage did not believe in profit. However, equitability was not forbiddened. Such led to the tributary and cultural exchanges between Korea and China. These beliefs... ...er Japanese control, as well as to keep Korea profitable for Japan.Did Japan modernize Korea? No. Did the Japanese aid in the beginning of Koreas industrialization period? Yes, the infrastructure and technology forced upon Korea definitely gave the Korean people a foundation to industrialization.The problem I have in saying that Japan regenerate Korea is that modernization in general has a positive connotation. I do not want to become a victim to the cliches of one race blaming another for certain hardships. However, I propose this question, Did the Japanese occupati on lead to positive modernization of Korea or the divisiveness that has haunted Korea for almost fifty years?I leave not say that if Japan did not invade Korea that Korea would be unified today, or am I willing to say that another country would not have tried to colonize Korea. I do believe that Korea when their society was ready would have mobilized themselves to become an industrialized nation. I also believe that when they would have come to that point that they would have enjoyed the same type of success in growth rate that was present from the late 1960s. The only difference is when would Korea start.