Susan Sontag's claim it is clear that photography limits people's interpretation of the world.

Susan Sontag?s claim it is clear that effigy taking limits community?s interpretation of the world. This claim I false because foresees rang from stack in complete destitution as seen by photos of Jacob Riis to pile having a good time on vacation. Because of this diverse appeal of pictures, people see the world as it is instead of ?to a greater extent than it very is?. This is seen through actions of Hitler various world events such the Vietnam warf ar and the Kent subject incident as well as lit like The Jungle by Upton Sinclair. These eclectic sources show that picture taking does not limit our witness upon the world and how things really argon because the picture is a clear view of what really happened. Hitler shows that photography shows a clear view of the world. Unlike what Sontag stated in lines 21-23 Hitler proves her wrong. semipolitical and ethical acquaintance is shown by photos taken of Hitler?s parsimoniousness camps. These pictures show the torture of m illions. They also show that photography does not limit our understanding of the world. By examining these photos basic knowledge and accounting is evident. These photos show how the world was and what exactly happened hence contradicting with Sontag?s statements in line 23.

This shows that Hitler?s actions was a clear view of how photography does not limit out understanding of the world, quite a helps us expand knowledge. Incidents at Kent posit University and the Vietnam War are two examples of what the world was at a certain point. If ace is to manifestation at a photo of the incident at Kent State they woul d realize that is actually what happened the! re at that point. The picture does not leave out any detail because it is like a visual that will stay for a unyielding stage of time... If you want to get a full essay, prescribe it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper