Sources from ancient historians tend to be more conflicting towards Agrippina because she was a woman and she stepped outside the expected role of a Roman Catholic matron. In contrast to this, modern historians consider the context of her measure out and approach her with a neutral attitude. However, most of the historians present her meet to three main stereotypes- the seducer and murderer of Claudius, the scheming and tyrannic mother figure or the imperial woman who goes beyond her matronly and aristocratic role. Tacitus, an ancient historian, was the closest to Agrippinas time and was inappropriate towards her since he disliked the principate, instead favouring the senate to be in power. He portrayed Agrippina as a deceptive, ill- mannered woman and is highly- vituperative of her behaviour. Tacitus claimed that the death of Junius Silanus was treacherously contrived by Agrippina and that she deterred a boylike noble man from marrying Junia Silana because she wanted to keep him from obtaining the childless Silanas wealth. bitstock of the above cases highlight Agrippinas deception and manipulative s annihilates. Tacitus presents his condescending invade of women when he wrote, A youth under feminine shadow down was not reassuring. Not only this, he believes that Agrippinas barbaric and menacing behaviour upsetted Nero and led him to poison his stepbrother, Britannicus.
In summation to this, Tacitus wrote that Agrippinas intolerable manner led to Neros decision to kill her. He believed that a plot to kill her would not stool because her venomous conscience would keep her alert. Thi s shows that not only does he lodge Agrippi! na for her death but he also labelled her as being a criminal. However, Dio Cassius is not as acid towards Agrippina as Tacitus and his comments on her are less subjective. This can be seen in the case of Claudius death... If you want to get a complete essay, purchase order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper