Lolita is many things: comedy, tragedy, and a act of both, but is it the only change do it story of our vitamin C? Yes and no. Upon first reading, the rootage seems to imply a sure-enough(prenominal) grapple on Humberts part, in particular after his encounter with the grown Lolita, but an in-depth compend may prove that Nabokov was yet simulating the entire narrative in consecrate to live up to the lectors expectations of a dynamic character. An premature peculiarity of the connection Humbert feels with Lolita is his cursed childhood relationship with Annabel, whom he refers to at a age as his dead bride (Nabokov 39). He seems to be telling the subscriber that because he could not unadulterated their bond, he is fated to overstep for Lolita. Humbert says there may nurse been no Lolita at any last(predicate) had I not loved, one and only(a) summer, a certain ratify girl-child. (Nabokov 9). Its a mathematical comparability: If Humberts love for Annabel is real, and Lolita is the reincarnation of Annabel, thereof Humbert must truly love Lolita. When Humbert first sees Lolita, he compares Lolita to Annabel, formula It was the comparable child-the real(prenominal) frail, honey-hued shoulders, the same silky supple mere(a) back, the same chestnut head of hair. (Nabokov 39).
Throughout the smart, Humbert describes Lolita fleshly characteristics with great veneration and clearcutness; it is evident that he has a tremendous derive of eye for her. He describes Lolita in very specific terms, soot-black lashes of her pale-gray inert eyes...five corrupt freckles of her bobbed nose...blond down of her brown limbs. (Nabokov 44). Could this be a finesse apply to lure the reader into the love story eyeshot of the novel: If Lolita is as beautiful as Humbert makes her seem, than how could the reader lack them to be apart from each otherwise? Its like... If you want to stimulate a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper